Reframing the Ancient and the Modern
We often hear the phrase, “trust the science,” particularly in matters of health, medicine, and public policy. At the same time, billions of people across the world continue to hold religious and spiritual beliefs that include miracles, or events that appear to defy natural explanation. This creates an apparent tension: if science explains the world through observable and repeatable processes, where do miracles fit?
This question becomes even more intriguing when we consider that miraculous events, such as the resurrection of Christ, the parting of the Red Sea, or the “burning bush,” are described as miracles, where miracles were relatively common in ancient texts, yet seem absent or highly disputed in modern times. Has something changed in reality itself, or has the change occurred within human perception and interpretation?
The Scope and Limits of Science
Science is a powerful and reliable method for understanding the natural world. It is based on systematic observation, measurement, and replication (Popper, 2002). Through this process, science has explained countless phenomena once considered mysterious or divine, including disease processes, weather patterns, and neurological conditions.
However, science operates within specific boundaries:
- It studies repeatable and observable phenomena
- It relies on empirical evidence and falsifiability
- It does not address one-time, unrepeatable events effectively
By definition, miracles are:
- Singular
- Non-repeatable
- Often tied to subjective or spiritual meaning
Thus, science does not necessarily disprove miracles, it simply lacks the tools to evaluate them within its framework.
Ancient Interpretations of Extraordinary Events
In ancient times, the absence of scientific understanding often led to supernatural interpretations of natural events. For example:
- Seizures or altered states may have been viewed as spiritual possession or divine encounter
- Sudden recovery from illness may have been interpreted as miraculous healing
- Unusual environmental events could be attributed to divine intervention
This does not imply that all ancient accounts are false, but rather that interpretation was shaped by available knowledge and cultural worldview (Ehrman, 2014).
Additionally, many ancient narratives were transmitted orally before being recorded in written form. Oral traditions often emphasize meaning, symbolism, and moral teaching, which can lead to amplification or stylization over time (Vansina, 1985).
Revisiting Biblical Miracles Through a Modern Lens
Scholars have proposed natural explanations for some biblical events:
- The parting of the Red Sea may reflect wind-driven water displacement or tidal phenomena (Drews & Han, 2010)
- The burning bush could represent a natural flame or symbolic narrative
- Reports of healing may involve spontaneous remission or psychosomatic effects
The resurrection of Christ, however, remains a unique case. Interpretations vary widely:
- A literal supernatural event (faith-based view)
- Misinterpretation of death (e.g., premature burial)
- Visionary or psychological experiences among followers
- A symbolic theological narrative
From a scientific standpoint, the resurrection cannot be verified or falsified due to its historical and non-repeatable nature. It exists primarily within the domains of theology, philosophy, and historical interpretation (Licona, 2010).
Why Miracles Seem Absent Today
Several factors contribute to the perceived decline in miracles:
1. Increased Scientific Knowledge
Modern science explains many phenomena that were once mysterious. As understanding grows, fewer events are classified as supernatural.
2. Higher Standards of Evidence
Today’s claims are evaluated through:
- Documentation
- Video recording
- Independent verification
Extraordinary claims now require substantial evidence (Sagan, 1996).
3. Cultural Skepticism
Modern society emphasizes critical thinking and empirical validation. Claims of miracles are often met with scrutiny or psychological interpretation.
Bridging Science and Spirituality
Rather than viewing science and faith as opposing forces, they can be understood as addressing different aspects of human experience:
- Science explores mechanisms and processes
- Philosophy examines meaning and reasoning
- Spirituality engages with purpose, connection, and transcendence
For example, meditation has been shown to influence brain function and emotional regulation (Davidson & McEwen, 2012), while also producing subjective experiences of insight and transformation. Both perspectives offer valid, complementary insights.
A Holistic Interpretation of Miracles
From a holistic standpoint, miracles may be reframed as:
- Events that lie at the edge of current understanding
- Experiences that carry profound personal or collective meaning
- Interpretations shaped by cultural, psychological, and spiritual frameworks
In this view, the question is not simply whether miracles are “real” or “not real,” but how humans interpret and assign meaning to extraordinary experiences.
The apparent divide between science and miracles may not reflect a change in reality, but rather a transformation in human perception. Ancient people interpreted the unknown through a spiritual lens, while modern society relies on scientific frameworks to explain the same phenomena.
Both approaches seek to understand existence, one through measurement, the other through meaning. Perhaps the most balanced perspective is not to choose between science and faith, but to recognize their respective roles. Science explains how the world works, while spirituality explores why it matters.
References
Davidson, R. J., & McEwen, B. S. (2012). Social influences on neuroplasticity: Stress and interventions to promote well-being. Nature Neuroscience, 15(5), 689–695. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3093
Drews, C., & Han, W. (2010). Dynamics of wind setdown at Suez and the Eastern Nile Delta. PLoS ONE, 5(8), e12481. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012481
Ehrman, B. D. (2014). How Jesus became God: The exaltation of a Jewish preacher from Galilee. HarperOne.
Licona, M. R. (2010). The resurrection of Jesus: A new historiographical approach. IVP Academic.
Popper, K. (2002). The logic of scientific discovery. Routledge.
Sagan, C. (1996). The demon-haunted world: Science as a candle in the dark. Ballantine Books.
Vansina, J. (1985). Oral tradition as history. University of Wisconsin Press.


















